Sunday, March 11, 2012

Things to Think About before you Vote 2012

It is safe to say that we've all heard the phrase, “Those that don't remember the past are doomed to repeat it.” I'm talking about the upcoming election cycle, but probably not in the context in which you might be thinking. Does everyone remember how Adolph Hitler came to power? For those of you not alive during that time in history, Germany had been stripped of her wealth and ability coming out of World War I. Germany was forced to pay war reparations on the basis of, ‘to the victors go the spoils.’ Germany was in the middle of a great political struggle between a myriad of factions. And the world was heading into The Great Depression.



You may hold the opinion that there is nothing of that era that is even remotely close to things as they are today. I would like to differ with that view. An entire people had been stripped of their national identity and forced into abject poverty as a nation. There was no clear leadership and indeed, the numerous factions vying for political control of the nation were literally fighting in the streets for superiority. The people themselves had no hope and were forced into subservience. Adolph Hitler rose to power, a figurative phoenix rising from the ashes if you will, and was able to pull Germany together and give it a sense of purpose. A sense of purpose based on racial and ethnic superiority and a military economy to re-arm and re-equip the Army, Navy, and Air Force of Germany.

Today, the United States rests in the shadow of it’s former self, just like Germany prior to the arrival of Hitler. Individual and Corporate greed has stripped our ability and our status as leader in the free world, just like the Allied powers stripped Germany immediately after World War I. We are incapable of sustaining ourselves as an industrial nation.



But the coup d’tat that was to become the greatest horror of the 20th Century began as a political rallying cry from a political extremist with well orchestrated moves. The rhetoric that propelled Hitler into power was based on nationalism and fervent pride in the German people and Nation. There was no political discourse after Hitler assumed power. The only detail to be concerned with was the Nazi detail and whatever Hitler said was the way it was, in essence, might makes right. Today, rather than finding ourselves in discourse over political direction, which ideally would be slightly left or slightly right of the middle, we find ourselves locked in mortal combat as political adversaries with each other, not to accomplish the most good for the most people, but as a game of one upping each other in order to win. Just like that period of time in Germany, each faction is trying to gain political control. And as if that weren’t enough, there are factions in both mainstream parties that want to splinter and faction themselves off. Yes, the Tea Party is an example of that concept. It pays to bear in mind that America and Americans atypically gravitate toward the political middle or moderate view/stance. Few take radical or extreme stances in politics. Yet, we have this radicalization of politics and as may be elucidated in a broad and general sense, when these factions fail to succeed in one aspect, they often are willing to try another. What that means is, if they are unable to win their objectives politically, they are oft times willing to try to gain their objectives with force and violence. Take a look at how most terrorist groups grow and evolve. Born out of social strife and struggle, they fail to win or garner influence through traditional means so they turn to violence as a means to an end. Am I implying that your local tea partier will resort to violence? No, but there is that potential. To provide levity, look at groups such the Animal and Earth Liberation Fronts (ALF and ELF) that resort to criminal acts and violence in order to perpetuate their ideas on others. Who dares wins? No one seems concerned about the whole, unless it involves waving a flag and the sphere of interest encompasses that pinpoint ideology that each adheres to.



Don’t take the next few statements out of context. The only reason I use the political right is because they are currently at the forefront of the national spotlight and easy to view and assess. If it were turned around, I would do the same with the left. The political frontrunners of the right tell us that all it takes is for America to stand strong. Well, I’m all for that. It’s time we started making our own cars, televisions, furniture, appliances, machinery, and food again. But it seems the only thing that we can build is bombs, tanks, and planes. It’s time we rejuvenated our steel industry, our electronics and oil industries. It’s time we made it so expensive for those criminal corporations to off shore themselves and try to do business here that it is cheaper to hire, reside, and produce here. Now you can call that a tax, tariff, or protectionism; it matters not. What it does is take away the advantage of going off shore in the first place. It protects our people, our workers, and our industries. Those that clamor for a free market economy are often the ones that stand to benefit the most. They want free markets, but they likewise want tax shelters, breaks, and subsidies paid to them. They want it all. And again the corollary shows between the US and Germany during the rise of Hitler. Hitler watched the corporations grow fat on war profits and stripped the people of the means to live, subsist, and make a decent life for themselves. And he turned the focus of the people on those corporations and demonized them. Look at the insane profits being generated at present by the corporations in the United States and held off shore. I’m not talking small business. Small business is hurting right along with the middle class.



The right or conservative factions scream that it is the fault of the current sitting president. Deficit spending, huge debt, printing money devaluing the currency, all equate to a backslide of the United States from hegemon. We have stood by and watched the protections of the Constitution erode on the basis of personal safety. We aren’t any safer than we were 10 years ago, as we approach the anniversary of the bombing of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. There is an illusion that we’re safer. But what happens when you feel safe, regardless of whether you are or not? You relax, you let your guard down, and bam. Sure there have been reports every now and then about this, that, or the other terrorist threat or attempt successfully abated. That is to keep the masses pacified and prevent words such as these. If words challenging the voracity of such action do arise, then it provides ‘proof’ that the Patriot Act is working.



“Freedom isn’t Free” is another one of those terms that we’ve all heard before. And it’s true. The structure of our society is such that we have the greatest personal liberty, or did, of any sovereign nation on the planet. There are risks inherent to that concept and living that way, including the occasional loss of life. Be it through a criminal act like armed robbery or a terrorist attack, domestic or international. But the fact that our system succeeds is the testament to greatness. That the people are resolute in their will to exercise the freedoms they have, despite being bombed, slashed, or repressed. Where we fail is that we barter away our liberties a bit at a time for the benefit of feeling safe, or want of a job, or a million and one other things that are of little consequence to survival.



Because that is where we are at present folks. We teeter on the brink. The middle class of this nation has been reduced to the point that it is simply getting by. The elites of this nation and world are increasing their wealth in leaps and bounds and we are admonished that we merely have to work hard in order to succeed. That day has past I’m afraid. We must work hard now just to survive. To provide food, shelter, and basic needs, we are forced to settle for less than what we are deserving of, simply because we are in a moment of weakness and accept what is offered rather than hold out and demand what is ours by right. And you know something? We have quite literally done it to ourselves. We take what we are told at face value and give control to those who would make a mockery of our freedoms and processes. So while I brought the Presidential aspirants of the right side of the line into focus earlier, it cuts hard across both sides and all political ideologies, and that brings me back to the original premise of this piece. This nation is rife for the assent to power of a person such as Adolph Hitler. This nation is at a political low tide and feelings of desperation are pervading the population. As more and more people figure out how we’ve been duped and how they’ve been taken advantage of by those who take advantage of rules and laws they’ve had passed for the express purpose of running rough shod over a vast majority of the population, all in the name of making a buck, class conflict moves closer and a person of the ilk of Hitler taking power comes closer to being a reality.



The reason I hit so many topics is because those are general topics of the talking points we all hear on what is now a regular basis. I haven’t covered them to great depth, since to do so would increase this to something of a thesis. But look at the time and number of words used to briefly bring each into context. Now look at what the politicians are wanting you to decide on a 30 second blurb of tilted logic. We are going to hear quite a bit in this election cycle, locally as we move closer to November and nationally as primary season approaches mid 2012. And lastly, be careful what it is you ask for. You just might get it.

11 comments:

  1. Anonymous7:57 AM

    I so agree !

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jim P8:14 AM

    As soon as the people of America get there tails out from between there legs and start doing something about this, things well change. Like ocuppy, that needs to keep going. I can go on n on but i have one question, why do government officials get full benefits after serving only one term n ger a retirement from us for the rest of there lives?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bradley6:47 PM

    Great point of view! I like your article.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Tango312:38 PM

    That's an exceptionally accurate photograph you've placed with this piece!! Kudos for finding the right illustration to match the words and the intent!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous2:10 PM

    Yes - the real question is the slope of change and who is the Hitler! We are close to the tipping point beyond which we will not recover. Both parties perpetuate the same arguments to maintain their power. Meanwhile it is the people who keep losing. The slope of change is accelerating in a downward direction as I am writing this. As for who is or will be the Hitler. Hitler was the ultimate Narcacist. He used the word I all the time. It was all about him and power. He used the power of the media to control opinions. He promised great change. He gave the German people hope. He consolidated his own power at the expense of the German Consitution. He nationalized the industrial complex and soon was running all aspect of the every day German's life. So who is the Hitler? Time will tell. Meanwhile the sustainability of our country goes down every single day while the two parties play their games in Washington. They keep spending money we dont have, they continue to enslave us by debt. They buy our votes with government programs. The American people have become the whores of our own government.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tango37:42 PM

      narcissist, actually. Hitler was more despot than narcissist however and a complete fascist. Reading the rationale of your writing, I get an implication of who you infer. The entire premise of the original piece however, is the fact that we have to get along, which means playing nice, even in Congress, despite moron radical positions. Otherwise this despotic ruler will assume power. Given the implications of empire that currently prevail in this country, that would tend to provide an avenue for the assent to power of a fascist, not one with socialized or moderate tendencies. Either extreme however, left or right, is unacceptable.

      Delete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous2:43 PM

    Job Creation in the United States in 2012 by Steve Burks

    1. Increase Investment Capital - Cut the Capital Gains Rate to encourage investment.

    2. Energy – lower the cost of energy by reducing taxes on energy and provide additional tax incentives to use green technology.

    3. More Spending Money - Individual Tax Cuts by extending Bush era tax cuts. Eliminate the death tax. Greatly simplify the tax code and reduce the tax rate for all employees.

    4. Small Business Capital – increase SBA lending to small businesses by releasing money to local banks and guarantee the loans to 95% level. Use very easy, forgiving application and payback terms, and have lengthy terms at low rates. Get the SBA to use student loan type repayment terms (Graduated and long payback periods.) Get the SBA to loan money, not pretend they are.

    5. Encourage U.S. Hiring and Reindustrialization of United States – Tax credits for hiring new permanent employees in the US, indexed to the ratio of US versus Overseas employees. Double tax credit for hiring U.S. employees laid off because of offshoring. No federal income taxes on rehired employees laid off where offshoring occurred for up to ten (10) years. Tax credits for payments to former U.S. employees to extent of reductions in compensation due to offshoring, and to extent of reductions in pensions. Tax credits to owners of businesses, including corporations, for reopening plants offshored 1989 – present and/or where U.S. industries existed pertaining to the offshored plants. Taxes of 91% on all net income of United States CEOs who offshored plants and jobs and whose net income was, year-by-year, in excess of compensation to U.S. President for 1989 - present, the era of the “global world order”.

    6. Onshore Jobs - Remove all tax incentives to move hiring overseas. Mandate government purchasing of USA made goods and services unless there are overwhelming reasons to purchase from a foreign business entity.

    7. Duties - duties on imports of all products from abroad except where exporting country buys equal amount or more of U.S. products. Tax incentives for U.S. companies for advertising U.S.-made products.

    8. Healthcare – purchase insurance across stateliness. Purchasing – allow cooperative purchasing of Healthcare by small businesses. Above all else,
    eliminate antitrust exemptions for health care insurance firms.

    9. Safety Standards – Apply quality standards to all products produced overseas to the same level as produced in the US. FDA has to be required to inspect all overseas plants and that no pharmaceuticals or food products or toys or clothing or vehicles can be sold in the US without the inspection.

    10. Corporate Taxes – eliminate all corporate taxes on goods produced in the United States.

    11. Environmental Regulations – lower costs by implementing National Uniform environmental regulations for gasoline blends and air emissions. Eliminate mandatory addition of ethanol to gasoline.

    12. Citizens – enforce immigration laws so that only people who are legally authorized to work in the US can work here. This will enable young people to find employment.

    13. Education – promote the education of US Citizens by eliminating all federal support of foreigners in US graduate schools. Use our tax dollars to education our citizens, to retrain our citizens to enable them to get good paying jobs in new fields. Over 80% of the students in many scientific disciplines in our graduate schools are foreigners. These students are no longer staying in the US as the jobs are in China etc. Our tax dollars should not be spent to education the world’s workforce. It should be used to educate our citizens to fill the needs of our country.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tango37:21 PM

      Items 1-5, 7 in part, and 10 all carry the same basic mantra; cut corporate taxes, give tax incentives to companies. Please. We already know that lowering the capital gains tax does not encourage job growth. The output as far as industry is concerned is running peak at this point in time. I might add that the Bush era tax cuts have already been extended, thanks to John Boehner and Mitch McConnell. The jobless rate continued and rose. But those making $250,000 or more got their tax break. I’m so proud. If you have enough money to sink into venture or speculative finance, are you really that worried about what the tax rate is? That’s like the CEO of Royal Dutch Shell worrying what the price of gas is. And… there should be no difference between earned and unearned income. It’s all income. No, we don’t pay companies to off shore jobs and we don’t pay them to bring jobs back. As I eluded to above and will now point out, the last estimate I saw said that over 4 million jobs are gone and not coming back. Production is running at peak across most of the remaining manufacturers in the US. If you’re producing and doing it with fewer workers, why would you hire more? As far as the SBA is concerned, with all the tax cuts, how are you going to loan money? You’ve got to have money to loan in order to loan it, don’t you? By stretching out the payments, you’re tying up your capital for quite a while. That is going to mean you need more money to loan until this system reaches some sort of equilibrium.

      Companies don’t see commitment to community or nation any more. Once the deal you strike with them expires, then they are ready to negotiate a better deal with the next highest bidder. Companies don’t deserve incentives. They damn sure don’t deserve tax breaks. But for the behavior they have exhibited, they really do deserve to pay more.

      I think tariffs on goods imported by those that left the country is an excellent idea. I’m thinking the difference between the wage they would have paid, the wage they are now paying, plus 20%. If they are going in the hole by remaining off-shore, guess where they are coming to? There’s your incentive to come back and manufacture in the US.

      The rest I can pretty much agree with in a general manner. Nothing definite without details and that is a bit difficult given the limitations of the character count.

      Delete
  8. Anonymous2:56 PM

    Solving the US National Debt Problem - Initial Draft

    1. Stop the Expansion of Spending – Immediately put a freeze on all additional spending for the remaining months of 2012.
    2. Cut the spending - Budgets in future years must be reduced by 3% in total dollars until we have reduced the total budget to 21% of the current year’s level.
    3. Reduce the Programs – Reduce the overall number of programs the government has.
    4. Taxes – Implement a flat tax system for corporations. Allow corporations to deduct R&D expenses only. Allow them to expense all equipment purchases 100% in first year. NO other deductions of any kind. Implement a flat tax system for individuals. Allow the deduction of the first home mortgage interest and for charitable contributions only. NO other deductions of any kind.
    5. Congress – Congress was meant to be a part time job. Establish strict term limits. Eliminate all Congressional Perks. Eliminate all Congressional exemptions for the laws they pass.
    6. Overseas Expenditures – Eliminate all foreign aid except humanitarian aid. Eliminate all overseas bases except for one in each region. Bring the troops home. Abandon Afghanistan and Iraq completely.
    7. Healthcare – Allow purchase insurance across state lines. Purchasing – allow cooperative purchasing of Healthcare by small businesses. Above all else, eliminate antitrust exemptions for health care insurance firms. Provide routine healthcare though a clinic system and not the ER. Allow businesses to purchase insurance through the US government healthcare system at the same price.
    8. Reduce Employees – Cap the Federal workforce and allow reductions in the labor force through retirements and attrition.
    9. Reduce the Facilities – Reduce the amount of real estate the Government owns by 30%.
    10. Education – Eliminate the Department of Education and return the control of the schools to the States.
    11. Energy – The Department of Energy was founded to eliminate our dependence on foreign oil. It has not succeeded and is not focused on that.
    12. Technology – Federal Government should go paperless.
    More to follow.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tango35:18 AM

      Can you envision where we would be presently as a people and a nation if spending to keep the economy moving had not been done in the last 3 years? The scenario that serves as the beginning for this entire debate would most likely have come to fruition due to a lack of food, shelter, and hope. Life, as some believe, doesn’t end with the termination of your iphone® service. When you can’t eat, you have no place to stay, and no means of providing it for yourself, things start to become critical at that point. So no, I don’t have a real problem with the deficit spending in order to provide humanitarian aid to our own citizens and I’ll refrain from citing Maslow. I DO have a problem with people in Congress holding up unemployment benefit extensions on the basis of paying for them, but a few months prior to that, shoved a Bush tax cut extension for the upper tier tax crowd right on through with naught a word as to how it was going to be financed. Reduced to simplest terms, Congress was willing to starve the poor and out of work while providing for the wealthy.

      Defense spending is completely out of control. We’re dropping bombs and shooting missiles that cost millions of dollars each. What? And we’re firing them from a $400 million dollar weapons platform (e.g.; F-22 and F-35A, B, and C models). We are presently using weapons in Afghanistan on an adversary that is only a couple of generations removed from being armed with bows and spears. We can’t sustain ourselves by making munitions and selling arms to other countries. We can use the label of defense all we please, but I’m not naïve enough to believe that some one, at some point in time, won’t use those weapons offensively. So in that regard, it’s time to cut long and hard on our warring ways. I can say that with complete candor, I was a soldier and police officer. I made my living by being proficient with weapons for three decades.

      I agree with a flat tax rate for every entity; individual and corporation. As for sales tax, I’m all for a VAT (value added tax) that way, the price you see is the price you get, there no standing there computing sales tax. Oh, and no sales tax on food. But there is something to be said about a variable tax rate. I believe its purpose when instituted by Woodrow Wilson was to ensure that not too much wealth was amassed at the top. A systems analysis tells us that, unlike this faux concept of democracy that we cling to that puts the people in charge, it is actually money and accumulated political power that run this country. With one, you can get the other. When you have both… well maybe Wilson was the brighter cookie after all. Reagan put a halt to that premise that had been in place for almost 80 years. That’s where our slide down the mountain began.

      Some of your concepts are quite viable and I can concur with them. Some are not far reaching enough and some focus on problems from a singular point of view that I’m at odds with. However differences in conviction doesn’t mean that concepts can’t be debated civilly among ideological adversaries. Our leaders have forgotten what concession is to advance wellbeing for all. Sadly many ordinary citizens have followed that lead into extremist land. You did say there was more to come, so it will be interesting to see how this plays out.

      Delete